NASA could bring back SR-71 as missing Blackbird sparks wild speculation
about the world's fastest plane ever and former staffers contacted for 'help'

Date:
Fri, 02 Oct 2026 20:25:00 +0000

Description:
Reviving the 59-year-old jet would require rebuilding fuel, spares and expertise, and NASA has so far refused to explain why.

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter NASA's SR-71 Blackbird has vanished from its outdoor display pole Satellite imagery shows the Blackbird was gone by mid-May 2026, or possibly April Retired engineers Mike Relja and Tim Conners declined NASA's offer to help fly the Blackbird A Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird with tail number 844 has vanished from the outdoor exhibit at
NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center, prompting questions about the agency's plans.

Satellite imagery obtained by Aviation Week shows the aircraft had left its pole by the middle of May 2026, and possibly even as early as April. The aircraft left its pole months before Jared Isaacman, NASA's administrator, showed a silhouette resembling the Blackbird at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles in September. Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here: Former engineers say NASA asked for help Retired test engineer Mike Relja,
now well into his seventies, said NASA offered him work roughly four weeks
ago on returning the aircraft to flight, but he declined.

David Ash, a onetime Navy pilot who joined NASA in June to direct special projects, made the request but never explained the agency's motives. You may like The US Air Force wants its next generation of target drones to mimic stealth jets Ukrainian hackers claim to have shot down a $50m SU-57 fighter using Russia's own air defense US Air Force wants AI help to keep its Minuteman III nukes ticking until they're 66, or maybe 80

I told the guy, You know, Im too old to be doing this, Relja told Aviation Week . I wish you well. Id like to see you make it. It would be interesting. But I just dont think you can get there from here.

The airframe is 59 years old, and last flew on October 9, 1999 leaving a gap of almost 27 years and a long list of challenges. Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed! Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

Whoever takes this job should expect engines left idle for decades, cavities holding moisture and grit, and no spares after the $600 million stock was destroyed in 2007.

JP-7 fuel, triethylborane, hydraulic fluids and specialised ground carts
would also need restoring, Relja said, and the last JP-7 stocks were burned
in 2002.

NASA has not confirmed any plan to fly the aircraft again, and a spokesperson declined to explain why it was taken off its pole. What to read next The
Tesla Roadsters October reveal looks like another piece of pantomime
Satellite images confirm Ukraine's 800km drone strike destroyed an irreplaceable Russian bomber This drone spins itself invisible here's the science behind it

A similar offer was made to Tim Conners, a retired NASA test engineer, but he too declined the offer - however, he suggested that museum aircraft could supply spares, since nine Blackbirds reached exhibits with engines.

My first thought was, My god, I would drop everything [to help] My second thought was, How in the world are they going to do it? Those subsystems could be cannibalized, said Tim Conners.

The architecture was as simple as they could make itIts a big deal, but it should not be a showstoppercompared to some of the other challenges. Why NASA might want the aircraft When asked about the silhouette at a press
conference, Jared Isaacman said, "You sure that's a Blackbird?" and didnt clarify anything.

At the EAA AirVenture in July, journalists asked him whether he had authority to revive such an old aircraft, and his response was "That's classified."

The SR-71 cruised near Mach 3.2 at almost 85,000 feet, and NASA flew Blackbirds in the 1990s for research on propulsion, structures and sonic booms.

The Aviationist notes that no aircraft currently used by NASA can reproduce that combination of speed and altitude.

The Blackbird could also serve as a stepping stone between supersonic testing and hypersonic flight, or as a carrier for experimental vehicles, though the latter would need modifications.

Reviving a long-retired aircraft isn't unheard of, either. The F-117 left service in 2008, yet it still flies regularly for training and testing nearly two decades later.

The estimate for reactivating an SR-71 for intelligence missions, made about two years after the final flight, reached $40 million to $45 million.

Adjusting for inflation alone, that estimate would be roughly $75 million to $85 million today. The real cost would likely run higher given the need to rebuild the supply chains, spare parts, and trained crews. Follow TechRadar
on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/phone-communications/nasa-could-bring-back-sr-71 -as-missing-blackbird-sparks-wild-speculation-about-the-worlds-fastest-plane-e ver-and-former-staffers-contacted-for-help

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
* Origin: Mystic Hobbies BBS mystic-hobbies.com (954:895/2)